On Wed 14-01-15 10:42:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > mapping->backing_dev_info will go away, so don't rely on it. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > Acked-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/nilfs2/super.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/super.c b/fs/nilfs2/super.c > index 2e5b3ec..3d4bbac 100644 > --- a/fs/nilfs2/super.c > +++ b/fs/nilfs2/super.c > @@ -1077,8 +1076,7 @@ nilfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) > sb->s_time_gran = 1; > sb->s_max_links = NILFS_LINK_MAX; > > - bdi = sb->s_bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping->backing_dev_info; > - sb->s_bdi = bdi ? : &default_backing_dev_info; > + sb->s_bdi = &bdev_get_queue(sb->s_bdev)->backing_dev_info; Why don't you use blk_get_backing_dev_info() here? Otherwise the patch looks fine. So you can add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>