On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 12:47:14AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:41:43 -0800 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:12:11AM -0500, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 06:03:47AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > What is the status of this patch set? > > > > > > I have no outstanding bug reports against it. Linus told me that he > > > wants to see it come through Andrew's tree. I have an email two weeks > > > ago from Andrew saying that it's on his list. I would love to see it > > > merged since it's almost a year old at this point. > > > > And since then another month and aother merge window has passed. Is > > there any way to speed up merging big patch sets like this one? > > I took a look at dax last time and found it to be unreviewable due to > lack of design description, objectives and code comments. Hopefully > that's been addressed - I should get back to it fairly soon as I chew > through merge window and holiday backlog. Now that Jens has merged patches 1 and 2 into his block tree, you don't need to spend any time looking at those. If I could trouble you to merge patches 3 & 4 through mm, the rest of the patches are VFS/ext2, and maye we could merge those through Al's tree instead of taking your valuable time? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>