On Wed 07-01-15 13:41:24, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Michal. Sorry about the long delay.
>
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 05:41:47PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> ...
> > @@ -252,6 +220,8 @@ void thaw_kernel_threads(void)
> > {
> > struct task_struct *g, *p;
> >
> > + oom_killer_enable();
> > +
>
> Wouldn't it be more symmetrical and make more sense to enable oom
> killer after kernel threads are thawed? Until kernel threads are
> thawed, it isn't guaranteed that oom killer would be able to make
> forward progress, right?
Makes sense, fixed.
> Other than that, looks good to me.
Thanks! Btw. I plan to repost after Andrew releases new mmotm as there
are some dependencies in oom area.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>