Re: [PATCH v2] fs: proc: task_mmu: show page size in /proc/<pid>/numa_maps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 01:35:00PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon,  5 Jan 2015 12:44:31 -0500 Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This patch introduces 'kernelpagesize_kB' line element to /proc/<pid>/numa_maps
> > report file in order to help identifying the size of pages that are backing
> > memory areas mapped by a given task. This is specially useful to
> > help differentiating between HUGE and GIGANTIC page backed VMAs.
> > 
> > This patch is based on Dave Hansen's proposal and reviewer's follow-ups
> > taken from the following dicussion threads:
> >  * https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/21/454
> 
> Dave's changelog contains useful information which this one lacked.  I
> stole some of it.
> 
> : The output of /proc/$pid/numa_maps is in terms of number of pages like
> : anon=22 or dirty=54.  Here's some output:
> : 
> : 7f4680000000 default file=/hugetlb/bigfile anon=50 dirty=50 N0=50
> : 7f7659600000 default file=/anon_hugepage\040(deleted) anon=50 dirty=50 N0=50
> : 7fff8d425000 default stack anon=50 dirty=50 N0=50
> : Looks like we have a stack and a couple of anonymous hugetlbfs
> : areas page which both use the same amount of memory.  They don't.
> : 
> : The 'bigfile' uses 1GB pages and takes up ~50GB of space.  The
> : anon_hugepage uses 2MB pages and takes up ~100MB of space while the stack
> : uses normal 4k pages.  You can go over to smaps to figure out what the
> : page size _really_ is with KernelPageSize or MMUPageSize.  But, I think
> : this is a pretty nasty and counterintuitive interface as it stands.
> : 
> : This patch introduces 'kernelpagesize_kB' line element to
> : /proc/<pid>/numa_maps report file in order to help identifying the size of
> : pages that are backing memory areas mapped by a given task.  This is
> : specially useful to help differentiating between HUGE and GIGANTIC page
> : backed VMAs.
> : 
> : This patch is based on Dave Hansen's proposal and reviewer's follow-ups
> : taken from the following dicussion threads:
> :  * https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/21/454
> :  * https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/20/66
> 
> 
> > +	seq_printf(m, " kernelpagesize_kB=%lu", vma_kernel_pagesize(vma) >> 10);
> 
> This changes the format of the numa_maps file and can potentially break
> existing parsers.  Please discuss.
> 
> I'd complain about the patch's failure to update the documentation,
> except numa_maps appears to be undocumented.  Sigh.  What the heck is "N0"?
>
That's a nice opportunity to attempt to sharp my doc writing skills.
Sorry for the total failure to identify it earlier.
I just took it as a TODO note to send a patch to document this interface soon.

Happy new year.
-- Rafael

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]