On Sat, 20 Dec 2014, Dave Hansen wrote: > I sometimes wonder what 'numa_maps' purpose is any if we should have > _some_ kind of policy about what goes in there vs. smaps. numa_maps > seems to be turning in to smaps, minus the \n. :) > It seems like an interface, similar to the one proposed by Ulrich, that described the NUMA topology would have obsoleted numa_maps and you could only rely on smaps to determine locality. There's existing userspace dependencies on numa_maps already, though, so owell. I had to fix numa_maps output when autonuma was merged for a much more subtle difference at http://marc.info/?l=git-commits-head&m=139113691614467 so I know some people actually parse this and care quite a bit about its accuracy, it's a shame it can't be deprecated in favor of adding the necessary information to smaps. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>