On Sun 07-12-14 08:59:40, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 11:45:39AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> ....
> > void mark_tsk_oom_victim(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > {
> > set_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_MEMDIE);
> > + __thaw_task(tsk);
>
> Yeah, this is a lot better. Maybe we can add a comment at least
> pointing readers to where to look at to understand what's going on?
> This stems from the fact that OOM killer which essentially is a memory
> reclaim operation overrides freezing. It'd be nice if that is
> documented somehow.
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 19a08f3f00ba..fca456fe855a 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -426,6 +426,13 @@ void note_oom_kill(void)
void mark_tsk_oom_victim(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
set_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_MEMDIE);
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure that the task is woken up from uninterruptible sleep
+ * if it is frozen because OOM killer wouldn't be able to free
+ * any memory and livelock. freezing_slow_path will tell the freezer
+ * that TIF_MEMDIE tasks should be ignored.
+ */
__thaw_task(tsk);
}
Better?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>