Re: [RFC v2] percpu: Add a separate function to merge free areas

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, Christoph.

On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 02:28:10PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Well this is not a common use case and that is not what the per cpu
> allocator was designed for. There is bound to be signifcant fragmentation
> with the current design. The design was for rare allocations when
> structures are initialized.

My unverified gut feeling is that fragmentation prolly is a lot less
of a problem for percpu allocator given that most percpu allocations
are fairly small.  On the other hand, we do wanna pack them tight as
percpu memory is really expensive space-wise.  I could be wrong tho.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]