On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:53:37PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 12:57 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > >> Now, hash_preload can possibly insert an hpte in hash page table even if > >> the access is not allowed by the pte permissions. But i guess even that > >> is ok. because we will fault again, end-up calling hash_page_mm where we > >> handle that part correctly. > > > > I think we need a test case... > > > > I ran the subpageprot test that Paul had written. I modified it to ran > with selftest. > It's implied but can I assume it passed? If so, Ben and Paul, can I consider the series to be acked by you other than the minor comment updates? Thanks. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>