Re: [PATCH 02/10] mm: Add p[te|md] protnone helpers for use by NUMA balancing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 13:57 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:

>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> +/*
> + * These work without NUMA balancing but the kernel does not care. See the
> + * comment in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> + */
> +static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte)
> +{
> +	return (pte_val(pte) &
> +		(_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_USER)) == _PAGE_PRESENT;
> +}

I would add a comment clarifying that this only works for user pages,
ie, this accessor will always return "true" for a kernel page on ppc.

> +static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd)
> +{
> +	return pte_protnone(pmd_pte(pmd));
> +}
> +
>  static inline int pte_present(pte_t pte)
>  {
>  	return pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_NUMA_MASK;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 081d6f4..2e25780 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -502,6 +502,22 @@ static inline int pmd_present(pmd_t pmd)
>  				 _PAGE_NUMA);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> +/*
> + * These work without NUMA balancing but the kernel does not care. See the
> + * comment in include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> + */
> +static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte)
> +{
> +	return pte_flags(pte) & _PAGE_PROTNONE;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd)
> +{
> +	return pmd_flags(pmd) & _PAGE_PROTNONE;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> +
>  static inline int pmd_none(pmd_t pmd)
>  {
>  	/* Only check low word on 32-bit platforms, since it might be
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> index 177d597..d497d08 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> @@ -688,6 +688,26 @@ static inline int pmd_trans_unstable(pmd_t *pmd)
>  #endif
>  }
>  
> +#ifndef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> +/*
> + * Technically a PTE can be PROTNONE even when not doing NUMA balancing but
> + * the only case the kernel cares is for NUMA balancing and is only ever set
> + * when the VMA is accessible. For PROT_NONE VMAs, the PTEs are not marked
> + * _PAGE_PROTNONE so by by default, implement the helper as "always no". It
> + * is the responsibility of the caller to distinguish between PROT_NONE
> + * protections and NUMA hinting fault protections.
> + */
> +static inline int pte_protnone(pte_t pte)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int pmd_protnone(pmd_t pmd)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
>  /*
>   * _PAGE_NUMA distinguishes between an unmapped page table entry, an entry that


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]