> -----Original Message----- > From: Kirill A. Shutemov [mailto:kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 2:31 PM > To: Shachar Raindel > Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx; kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > mgorman@xxxxxxx; riel@xxxxxxxxxx; ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > matthew.r.wilcox@xxxxxxxxx; dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; n- > horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; torvalds@linux- > foundation.org; Haggai Eran; aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx; pfeiner@xxxxxxxxxx; > hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx; Sagi Grimberg; walken@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: Refactor do_wp_page, extract the reuse case > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 02:04:41PM +0200, Shachar Raindel wrote: > > When do_wp_page is ending, in several cases it needs to reuse the > > existing page. This is achieved by making the page table writable, > > and possibly updating the page-cache state. > > > > Currently, this logic was "called" by using a goto jump. This makes > > following the control flow of the function harder. It is also > > against the coding style guidelines for using goto. > > > > As the code can easily be refactored into a specialized function, > > refactor it out and simplify the code flow in do_wp_page. > > > > Signed-off-by: Shachar Raindel <raindel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > mm/memory.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > --------- > > 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c > > index 3e50383..61334e9 100644 > > --- a/mm/memory.c > > +++ b/mm/memory.c > > @@ -2020,6 +2020,75 @@ static int do_page_mkwrite(struct > vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page, > > } > > > > /* > > + * Handle write page faults for pages that can be reused in the > current vma > > + * > > + * This can happen either due to the mapping being with the VM_SHARED > flag, > > + * or due to us being the last reference standing to the page. In > either > > + * case, all we need to do here is to mark the page as writable and > update > > + * any related book-keeping. > > + */ > > +static int wp_page_reuse(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct > *vma, > > + unsigned long address, pte_t *page_table, > > + spinlock_t *ptl, pte_t orig_pte, > > + struct page *recycled_page, int dirty_page, > > recycled_page? what's wrong with old_page? > You are reusing the page in this function, so I was feeling that naming it "old" is less indicative than "recycled". However, if you prefer "old", I am happy with it. > Otherwise: > > Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Thanks :) --Shachar -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href