Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Replace _PAGE_NUMA with PAGE_NONE protections

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:18:43PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 11/18/2014 11:56 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >>> 4. Similarly, does the kernel boot properly without without patches?
> >> >
> >> > Yes, the kernel works fine without the patches both with and without fake
> >> > numa.
> > 
> > Hmm that is interesting. I am not sure how writeback_fid can be
> > related. We use writeback fid to enable client side caching with 9p
> > (cache=loose). We use this fid to write back dirty pages later. Can you
> > share the qemu command line used, 9p mount options and the test details ? 
> 
> I'm using kvmtool rather than qemu. rootfs is created via kernel parameters:
> 
> root=/dev/root rw rootflags=rw,trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L rootfstype=9p
> 
> The test is just running trinity, there's no 9p or mm specific test going on.
> 
> I've attached my .config.
> 

Ok, based on that I was able to reproduce the problem. I hope to have a
V2 before the end of the week. Thanks.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]