On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 03:05:15PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > BTW what do you think about the whole patch set that introduced it - > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/3/781 - w/o diving deeply into details, > > just by looking at the general idea described in the cover letter? > > The series is still stuck in my inbox and I plan to review your shrinker > code first. I hope to get to it ASAP but not sooner than Monday as I > will be off until Sunday. OK, then I think we'd better drop it and concentrate on the shrinkers first - I'll resend the shrinkers patch set on Monday then. Andrew, could you please revert the following patches: memcg-do-not-destroy-kmem-caches-on-css-offline slab-charge-slab-pages-to-the-current-memory-cgroup memcg-decouple-per-memcg-kmem-cache-from-the-owner-memcg memcg-zap-memcg_unregister_cache memcg-free-kmem-cache-id-on-css-offline memcg-introduce-memcg_kmem_should_charge-helper slab-recharge-slab-pages-to-the-allocating-memory-cgroup memcg-zap-kmem_account_flags memcg-turn-memcg_kmem_skip_account-into-a-bit-field memcg-only-check-memcg_kmem_skip_account-in-__memcg_kmem_get_cache [The last three patches are not the part of this patch set, but they depend on it, so I will resend them later] Terribly sorry for the noise. Thanks, Vladimir -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>