On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 06:32:41PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 12:20:29 +1100 Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 16:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 16:14:19 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Update generic gup implementation with powerpc specific details. > > > > On powerpc at pmd level we can have hugepte, normal pmd pointer > > > > or a pointer to the hugepage directory. > > > > > > I grabbed these. It would be better if they were merged into the powerpc > > > tree where they'll get more testing than in linux-next alone. > > > > Fine by me. Can I get an ack from you and/or someone else on CC? > > > > Only arm and arm64 use this code. Steve, could you please look it over > and check that arm is still happy? Hi Andrew, I've tested it and posted some comments on it. If the arch/arm and arch/arm64 changes are removed and a comment about an assumption made by the new gup_huge_pte code is added then I'm happy. Cheers, -- Steve -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>