On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:40:23AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 10:10 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > All the caller of __free_one_page() has similar migratetype recheck logic,
> > so we can move it to __free_one_page(). This reduce line of code and help
> > future maintenance. This is also preparation step for "mm/page_alloc:
> > restrict max order of merging on isolated pageblock" which fix the
> > freepage accouting problem on freepage with more than pageblock order.
> >
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index 5d2f807..433f92c 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -579,7 +579,15 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page,
> > return;
> >
> > VM_BUG_ON(migratetype == -1);
> > + if (unlikely(has_isolate_pageblock(zone) ||
> > + is_migrate_isolate(migratetype))) {
>
> Since the v4 change of patch 1, this now adds
> is_migrate_isolate(migratetype) also for the free_pcppages_bulk path,
> where it's not needed?
Yes, you are right. But, patch 4 needs is_migrate_isolate() check
in __free_one_page().
>
> > + migratetype = get_pfnblock_migratetype(page, pfn);
> > + if (is_migrate_isolate(migratetype))
> > + goto skip_counting;
> > + }
> > + __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, 1 << order, migratetype);
> >
> > +skip_counting:
> > page_idx = pfn & ((1 << MAX_ORDER) - 1);
> >
> > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_idx & ((1 << order) - 1), page);
> > @@ -725,14 +733,7 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count,
> > /* must delete as __free_one_page list manipulates */
> > list_del(&page->lru);
> > mt = get_freepage_migratetype(page);
> > - if (unlikely(has_isolate_pageblock(zone))) {
> > - mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page);
> > - if (is_migrate_isolate(mt))
> > - goto skip_counting;
> > - }
> > - __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, 1, mt);
> >
> > -skip_counting:
> > /* MIGRATE_MOVABLE list may include MIGRATE_RESERVEs */
> > __free_one_page(page, page_to_pfn(page), zone, 0, mt);
> > trace_mm_page_pcpu_drain(page, 0, mt);
>
> The 'mt' here for the tracepoint is now different. I know it's the same
> as before patch 2, but the value introduced by patch 2 is more correct
> than the reverting to pre-patch 2 done here.
Yes, you are right. I didn't notice that.
> This and the introduced check above are maybe minor things, but it makes
> me question the value of unifying the check when the conditions in the
> two call paths are not completely the same...
>
> I understand this is also prerequisity for patch 4 in some sense, but if
> you are reworking it anyway, then maybe this won't be needed in the end?
As mentioned above, is_migrate_isolate() check is needed in __free_one_page()
in any case. Reworked patch also needs this.
Hmm... I'd like to check isolate migratetype in just one place, but, it
seems to be impossible. To correct tracepoint, I will remain the check
in each functions. :/
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>