On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 12:52:45PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 10:56:36AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > Just an optimization. > > Does it make sense to split the thing in two? One where you apply > _unlocked and then one where you apply _fast? Yes but I already dropped the _fast optimization, as the latency enhancements to gup_fast were NAKed earlier in this thread. So this patch has already been updated to only apply _unlocked. http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/andrea/aa.git/commit/?id=bc2e0473b601c6a330ddb4adbcf4c048b2233d4e -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>