Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] Kernel address sanitizer - runtime memory debugger.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Yuri Gribov <tetra2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So in kernel we will need to support all API versions, and the
>> following looks like a much simpler way to identify current API
>> version:
>>> #if __GNUC__ == 5
>>> #define ASAN_V4
>
> What about having compiler(s) predefine some __SANITIZE_ADDRESS_ABI__
> macro for this? Hacking on __GNUC__ may not work given the zoo of GCC
> versions out there (FSF, Linaro, vendor toolchains, etc.)?

I don't have strong preference here... well, actually just not competent :)

But on the second though... what do we want to do with pre-build
modules? Can you envision that somebody distributes binary modules
built with asan?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]