> -----Original Message----- > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 03:31:42PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:00:02AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 08:09:47AM +0100, Wang, Yalin wrote: > > > > this patch extend the start and end address of initrd to be page > > > > aligned, so that we can free all memory including the un-page > > > > aligned head or tail page of initrd, if the start or end address > > > > of initrd are not page aligned, the page can't be freed by > free_initrd_mem() function. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yalin Wang <yalin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > (as I said, if Russell doesn't have any objections please send the > > > patch to his patch system) > > > > I now have an objection. The patches in the emails were properly > formatted. > > They were so close ;) > > I can see three patches but none of them exactly right: > > 8157/1 - wrong diff format > 8159/1 - correct format, does not have my ack (you can take this one if > you want) > 8162/1 - got my ack this time but with the wrong diff format again > > Maybe a pull request is a better idea. > I have resend the 2 patches: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8167/1 http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=8168/1 please have a look. Thanks -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href