> They were so close ;) > > I can see three patches but none of them exactly right: > > 8157/1 - wrong diff format > 8159/1 - correct format, does not have my ack (you can take this one if > you want) > 8162/1 - got my ack this time but with the wrong diff format again > > Maybe a pull request is a better idea. > I am really confused, I read this web: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/info.php it said use diff -urN to generate patch like this: diff -Nru linux.orig/lib/string.c linux/lib/string.c but I see other developers use git format-patch to generate patch and submit to the patch system. Git format-patch format can also be accepted by the patch system correctly ? If yes, I think this web should update, Use git format-patch to generate patch is more convenient than use diff -urN Thanks -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href