On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 09:11 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > Many embedded systems will not need these syscalls, and omitting them > saves space. Add a new EXPERT config option CONFIG_ADVISE_SYSCALLS > (default y) to support compiling them out. general question: if a user chooses CONFIG_ADVISE_SYSCALLS=n (or any config option related to tinyfication) and breaks the system/workload... will that be acceptable for a kernel pov? In other words, what's the degree of responsibility the user will have when choosing such builds? Thanks, Davidlohr -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>