Il 17/09/2014 18:58, Andres Lagar-Cavilla ha scritto:
> Understood. So in patch 1, would kvm_gup_retry be ... just a wrapper
> around gup? That looks thin to me, and the naming of the function will
> not be accurate.
Depends on how you interpret "retry" ("with retry" vs. "retry after
_fast"). :)
My point was more to make possible future bisection easier, but I'm not
going to insist. I'll queue the patch as soon as I get the required
Acked-by.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>