On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 01:27:14PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote: >> 2014-09-17 13:26+0300, Gleb Natapov: >> > For async_pf_execute() you do not need to even retry. Next guest's page fault >> > will retry it for you. >> >> Wouldn't that be a waste of vmentries? > This is how it will work with or without this second gup. Page is not > mapped into a shadow page table on this path, it happens on a next fault. The point is that the gup in the async pf completion from the work queue will not relinquish the mmap semaphore. And it most definitely should, given that we are likely looking at swap/filemap. Andres > > -- > Gleb. -- Andres Lagar-Cavilla | Google Kernel Team | andreslc@xxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href