On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2014-09-15 13:11-0700, Andres Lagar-Cavilla:
>> +int kvm_get_user_page_retry(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
>
> The suffix '_retry' is not best suited for this.
> On first reading, I imagined we will be retrying something from before,
> possibly calling it in a loop, but we are actually doing the first and
> last try in one call.
We are doing ... the second and third in most scenarios. async_pf did
the first with _NOWAIT. We call this from the async pf retrier, or if
async pf couldn't be notified to the guest.
>
> Hard to find something that conveys our lock-dropping mechanic,
> '_polite' is my best candidate at the moment.
I'm at a loss towards finding a better name than '_retry'.
>
>> + int flags = FOLL_TOUCH | FOLL_HWPOISON |
>
> (FOLL_HWPOISON wasn't used before, but it's harmless.)
Ok. Wasn't 100% sure TBH.
>
> 2014-09-16 15:51+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
>> Il 15/09/2014 22:11, Andres Lagar-Cavilla ha scritto:
>> > @@ -1177,9 +1210,15 @@ static int hva_to_pfn_slow(unsigned long addr, bool *async, bool write_fault,
>> > npages = get_user_page_nowait(current, current->mm,
>> > addr, write_fault, page);
>> > up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
>> > - } else
>> > - npages = get_user_pages_fast(addr, 1, write_fault,
>> > - page);
>> > + } else {
>> > + /*
>> > + * By now we have tried gup_fast, and possible async_pf, and we
> ^
> (If we really tried get_user_pages_fast, we wouldn't be here, so I'd
> prepend two underscores here as well.)
Yes, async pf tries and fails to do fast, and then we fallback to
slow, and so on.
>
>> > + * are certainly not atomic. Time to retry the gup, allowing
>> > + * mmap semaphore to be relinquished in the case of IO.
>> > + */
>> > + npages = kvm_get_user_page_retry(current, current->mm, addr,
>> > + write_fault, page);
>>
>> This is a separate logical change. Was this:
>>
>> down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>> npages = get_user_pages(NULL, mm, addr, 1, 1, 0, NULL, NULL);
>> up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>>
>> the intention rather than get_user_pages_fast?
>
> I believe so as well.
>
> (Looking at get_user_pages_fast and __get_user_pages_fast made my
> abstraction detector very sad.)
It's clunky, but a separate battle.
>
>> I think a first patch should introduce kvm_get_user_page_retry ("Retry a
>> fault after a gup with FOLL_NOWAIT.") and the second would add
>> FOLL_TRIED ("This properly relinquishes mmap semaphore if the
>> filemap/swap has to wait on page lock (and retries the gup to completion
>> after that").
>
> Not sure if that would help to understand the goal ...
>
>> Apart from this, the patch looks good. The mm/ parts are minimal, so I
>> think it's best to merge it through the KVM tree with someone's Acked-by.
>
> I would prefer to have the last hunk in a separate patch, but still,
>
> Acked-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Awesome, thanks much.
I'll recut with the VM_BUG_ON from Paolo and your Ack. LMK if anything
else from this email should go into the recut.
Andres
--
Andres Lagar-Cavilla | Google Kernel Team | andreslc@xxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href