Re: [PATCH v8 09/10] x86, mpx: cleanup unused bound tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/11/2014 08:02 PM, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
> On 2014-09-11, Hansen, Dave wrote:
>> On 09/11/2014 01:46 AM, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
>>> + * This function will be called by do_munmap(), and the VMAs
>>> + covering
>>> + * the virtual address region start...end have already been split
>>> + if
>>> + * necessary and remvoed from the VMA list.
>>
>> "remvoed" -> "removed"
>>
>>> +void mpx_unmap(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>> +		unsigned long start, unsigned long end) {
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	ret = mpx_try_unmap(mm, start, end);
>>> +	if (ret == -EINVAL)
>>> +		force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
>>> +}
>> 
>> In the case of a fault during an unmap, this just ignores the 
>> situation and returns silently.  Where is the code to retry the 
>> freeing operation outside of mmap_sem?
> 
> Dave, you mean delayed_work code? According to our discussion, it
> will be deferred to another mainline post.

OK, fine.  Just please call that out in the description.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]