On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 06:53:56PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 05:28:11PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > > > Too late for this now, yes. > > We could still introduce a __kfree_fast_path() which doesn't have > checking. Well, there certainly is precedence for that sort of thing. There is a bunch of code which uses __brelse(bh) instead of brelse(bh) when the caller is sure that bh is a valid non-NULL pointer. - Ted -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>