On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> commit 21caf2fc1931 ("mm: teach mm by current context info to not do I/O during memory allocation")
> introduces PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO flag to avoid doing I/O inside memory allocation, __GFP_IO is cleared
> when this flag is set, but __GFP_FS implies __GFP_IO, it should also be cleared. Or it may still
> run into I/O, like in superblock shrinker.
>
> Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: joyce.xue <xuejiufei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 5c2c885..2fb2c47 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1936,11 +1936,13 @@ extern void thread_group_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t *ut,
> #define tsk_used_math(p) ((p)->flags & PF_USED_MATH)
> #define used_math() tsk_used_math(current)
>
> -/* __GFP_IO isn't allowed if PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO is set in current->flags */
> +/* __GFP_IO isn't allowed if PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO is set in current->flags
> + * __GFP_FS is also cleared as it implies __GFP_IO.
> + */
> static inline gfp_t memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_t flags)
> {
> if (unlikely(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO))
> - flags &= ~__GFP_IO;
> + flags &= ~(__GFP_IO | __GFP_FS);
> return flags;
> }
>
Shouldn't this be a stable fix? If it is needed, then it will affect
all kernels that define PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO.
--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, PrimaryData
trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>