Re: regression caused by cgroups optimization in 3.17-rc2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/02/2014 06:33 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> kfree isn't eating 56% of "all cpu time" here, and it wasn't clear to
> me whether Dave filtered symbols from only memcontrol.o, memory.o, and
> mmap.o in a similar way.  I'm not arguing against the regression, I'm
> just trying to make sense of the numbers from the *patched* kernel.

I guess I could have included it in the description, but that was a
pretty vanilla run:

	perf top --call-graph=fp --stdio > foo.txt

I didn't use any filtering.  I didn't even know I _could_ filter. :)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]