On Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:06:36 +0100 Rob Jones <rob.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Many modules use seq_open() when seq_open_private() or > __seq_open_private() would be more appropriate and result in > simpler, cleaner code. > > This patch sequence changes those instances in IPC, MM and LIB. Looks good to me. I can't begin to imagine why we added the global, exported-to-modules seq_open_private() without bothering to document it, so any time you feel like adding the missing kerneldoc... And psize should have been size_t, ho hum. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>