On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 23:56:02 +0900 Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Replace memblock_find_in_range() and memblock_reserve() with > memblock_alloc_range() or memblock_alloc_base(). Please spend a little more time preparing the changelogs? Why are we making this change? Because memblock_alloc_range() is equivalent to memblock_find_in_range()+memblock_reserve() and it's just a cleanup? Or is there some deeper functional reason? Does memblock_find_in_range() need to exist? Can we convert all callers to memblock_alloc_range()? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>