Re: [PATCH 5/9 v2] SQUASHME: prd: Last fixes for partitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/25/2014 11:10 PM, Ross Zwisler wrote:
<>
> I think we can still have a working probe by instead comparing the passed in
> dev_t against the dev_t we get back from disk_to_dev(prd->prd_disk), but I'd
> really like a use case so I can test this.  Until then I think I'm just going
> to stub out prd/pmem_probe() with a BUG() so we can see if anyone hits it.
> 
> It seems like this is preferable to just registering NULL for probe, as that
> would cause an oops in kobj_lookup(() when probe() is blindly called without
> checking for NULL.
> 

I have a version I think you will love it removes the probe and bunch of
other stuff.

I tested it heavily it just works

Comming soon, I'm preparing trees right now
Thanks
Boaz

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]