Re: [PATCH] [v3] warn on performance-impacting configs aka. TAINT_PERFORMANCE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/22/2014 09:32 AM, Tim Chen wrote:
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_FREE
>> > +	"DEBUG_OBJECTS_FREE",
>> > +#endif
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
>> > +	"DEBUG_KMEMLEAK",
>> > +#endif
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
>> > +	"DEBUG_PAGEALLOC",
> I think coverage profiling also impact performance.
> So I sould also put CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL in the list.

Would CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE_ALL be the better one to check?  With plain
GCOV_KERNEL, I don't think we will, by default, put the coverage
information in any files and slow them down.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]