On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:20:53AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/14/2014 09:36 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > Thanks for dredging this back up!
> >
> > On 08/14/2014 07:18 AM, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> >> +int valid_phys_addr_range(phys_addr_t addr, size_t count)
> >> +{
> >> + return addr + count <= __pa(high_memory);
> >> +}
> >
> > Is this correct on 32-bit? It would limit /dev/mem to memory below 896MB.
> >
>
> Last I checked, /dev/mem was already broken for highmem... which is
> actually a problem. I would prefer to see it fixed.
>
> -hpa
>
Hi Peter,
thank you for jumping in again. I'm not going to pretent I fully understand this
code, as proven by Dave :), but wouldn't it help just to move the high_memory
check directly to the xlate_dev_mem_ptr. Meaning no high_memory check in
valid_phys_addr_range for x86. I sent more info in my reply to Dave's mail.
Again many thanks.
--
Frantisek Hrbata
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>