On Tue, 29 Jul 2014, Zhang Zhen wrote:
> Commit ea0854170c95245a258b386c7a9314399c949fe0 added a fuction
This would normally be written as
Commit ea0854170c95 ("memory hotplug: fix a bug on /dev/mem for 64-bit
kernels") ...
> update_end_of_memory_vars() to update high_memory, max_pfn and
> max_low_pfn.
>
> I modified the function according to Dave Hansen and David Rientjes's
> suggestions.
> And call it in arch_remove_memory() to update these variables too.
>
When the x86 maintainers merge this patch, they'll need to make a judgment
call on how urgent the fix is and that will guide them in whether they
want it backported to stable kernels as well. It would be useful to
provide the rationale for the change; in other words, why is the change
needed and what breaks if we don't have it?
> Change v1->v2:
> - according to Dave Hansen and David Rientjes's suggestions modified
> update_end_of_memory_vars().
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
You'll want to email all the x86 maintainers who would handle this patch,
check the output of scripts/get_maintainer.pl when run on this diff.
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index df1a992..fd7bd6b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -673,15 +673,11 @@ void __init paging_init(void)
> * After memory hotplug the variables max_pfn, max_low_pfn and high_memory need
> * updating.
> */
> -static void update_end_of_memory_vars(u64 start, u64 size)
> +static void update_end_of_memory_vars(u64 end_pfn)
Extra space that can be removed here at the same time as a cleanup.
> {
> - unsigned long end_pfn = PFN_UP(start + size);
> -
> - if (end_pfn > max_pfn) {
> - max_pfn = end_pfn;
> - max_low_pfn = end_pfn;
> - high_memory = (void *)__va(max_pfn * PAGE_SIZE - 1) + 1;
> - }
> + max_pfn = end_pfn;
> + max_low_pfn = end_pfn;
> + high_memory = (void *)__va(max_pfn * PAGE_SIZE - 1) + 1;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -694,6 +690,7 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + ZONE_NORMAL;
> unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long end_pfn;
> int ret;
>
> init_memory_mapping(start, start + size);
> @@ -702,7 +699,9 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
>
> /* update max_pfn, max_low_pfn and high_memory */
> - update_end_of_memory_vars(start, size);
> + end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages;
> + if (end_pfn > max_pfn)
> + update_end_of_memory_vars(end_pfn);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1018,6 +1017,7 @@ int __ref arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> struct zone *zone;
> + unsigned long end_pfn;
> int ret;
>
> zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
> @@ -1025,6 +1025,11 @@ int __ref arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
> ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
>
> + /* update max_pfn, max_low_pfn and high_memory */
> + end_pfn = start_pfn + nr_pages;
> + if ((max_pfn >= start_pfn) && (max_pfn < end_pfn))
> + update_end_of_memory_vars(start_pfn);
Not sure if we really need the new variable here; if you choose to
repropose this patch then you may want to consider just using
start_pfn + nr_pages in the conditional.
> +
> return ret;
> }
> #endif
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>