Hi Jiang, On 11.07.2014 [15:37:17 +0800], Jiang Liu wrote: > Previously we have posted a patch fix a memory crash issue caused by > memoryless node on x86 platforms, please refer to > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1687425 > > As suggested by David Rientjes, the most suitable fix for the issue > should be to use cpu_to_mem() rather than cpu_to_node() in the caller. > So this is the patchset according to David's suggestion. Hrm, that is initially what David said, but then later on in the thread, he specifically says he doesn't think memoryless nodes are the problem. It seems like the issue is the order of onlining of resources on a specifix x86 platform? memoryless nodes in and of themselves don't cause the kernel to crash. powerpc boots with them (both previously without CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES and now with it) and is functional, although it does lead to some performance issues I'm hoping to resolve. In fact, David specifically says that the kernel crash you triggered makes sense as cpu_to_node() points to an offline node? In any case, a blind s/cpu_to_node/cpu_to_mem/ is not always correct. There is a semantic difference and in some cases the allocator already do the right thing under covers (falls back to nearest node) and in some cases it doesn't. Thanks, Nish -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>