Re: Some RAS bug fix patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:34:39PM -0400, Chen, Gong wrote:
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 22:34:39 -0400
> From: "Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Some RAS bug fix patches
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.0.0.rc2
> 
> [PATCH 1/3] APEI, GHES: Cleanup unnecessary function for lock-less
> [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86, MCE: Avoid potential deadlock in MCE context
> [PATCH 3/3] RAS, HWPOISON: Fix wrong error recovery status
> 
> The patch 1/3 & 3/3 are minor fixes which are irrelevant with patch
> 2/3. I send them together just to avoid fragments.
> 
> The patch 2/3 is a RFC patch depending on the following thread:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/27/26
> 
> Comments and suggestions are welcome.
> 
Hi, Boris

Any comments?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]