On 07/11/2014 01:20 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: >>>> Any comments are welcomed! >>> >>> Why would anybody _ever_ have a memoryless node? That's ridiculous. >> >> I'm with Peter here, why would this be a situation that we should even >> support? Are there machines out there shipping like this? > > We've always had memory nodes. > > A classic case in the old days was a two socket system where someone > didn't populate any DIMMs on the second socket. > > There are other cases too. > Yes, like a node controller-based system where the system can be populated with either memory cards or CPU cards, for example. Now you can have both memoryless nodes and memory-only nodes... Memory-only nodes also happen in real life. In some cases they are done by permanently putting low-frequency CPUs to sleep for their memory controllers. -hpa -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>