On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:51:06PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:20:51PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: > > >> > Any comments are welcomed! > > >> > > >> Why would anybody _ever_ have a memoryless node? That's ridiculous. > > > > > > I'm with Peter here, why would this be a situation that we should even > > > support? Are there machines out there shipping like this? > > > > We've always had memory nodes. > > > > A classic case in the old days was a two socket system where someone > > didn't populate any DIMMs on the second socket. > > That's a obvious; don't do that then case. Its silly. True. We should recommend that anyone running Linux will email you for approval of their configuration first. > > There are other cases too. > > Are there any sane ones Yes. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>