Hi, We are looking for advice on reading files opened for direct_io. IMA subsystem (security/integrity/ima) reads file content to kernel buffer with kernel_read() like function to calculate a file hash. It does not open another instance of 'struct file' but uses one allocated via 'open' system call. It works well when file was opened without O_DIRECT flag. In such case file content is read to the page cache and VFS simply copying data to the buffer. When buffer is a kernel buffer, it is successfully manged like: old_fs = get_fs(); set_fs(get_ds()); result = vfs_read(file, (void __user *)addr, count, &pos); set_fs(old_fs); In the case when file was opened with O_DIRECT flag, filesystem code copying data directly to user-space memory and set_fs(get_ds()) trick does not work anymore. To overcome this problem we thought about following possible solutions. 1. Allocate user-space memory with vm_mmap(). It works when when file is opened. current->mm is there... But IMA has certain case to re-read the file at file close. If file was not explicitly closed with 'close', it will be closed at process termination somewhere in do_exit(). But at the time file is closing from there, 'current->mm' has already gone and vm_mmap() fails. 2. Temporarily clear O_DIRECT in file->f_flags. This is how it looked like in the proposed patch some time ago... https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/20/601 In such approach, by clearing a flag, VFS would be able to write data to kernel buffer. But in such case we force to populate page cache which was not an intention of the process using O_DIRECT. There reason for the patch was actually a deadlock, because IMA takes i_mutex and VFS direct_io code also took it. Al Viro rejected the patch as from his opinion we contaminated locking rules. Now we will introduce internal locking and deadlock would not happen anyway and temporarily clearing O_DIRECT is not to workaround locking but to be able to read to kernel buffer. 3. Open another instance of the file with 'dentry_open' Such case would be also similar to temporarily clearing as we would populate the page cache... Yeah. O_DIRECT use is certainly rare.. 'man 2 open' has interesting statement from Linus... :) "The thing that has always disturbed me about O_DIRECT is that the whole interface is just stupid, and was probably designed by a deranged monkey on some serious mind-controlling substances."—Linus But anyway, there was few complains about deadlock with IMA+O_DIRECT. Currently we made a patch that when IMA is enabled it does not measure/appraise files opened with O_DIRECT. Instead it can be configured to block and log or allow and log O_DIRECT access... But we would want to cover O_DIRECT case completely and be able to read file.. Greg KH advised me to write to linux-mm and Andrew as well and ask about advices on possibility to handle O_DIRECT files. Is temporarily clearing O_DIRECT flag really unacceptable or not? Or may be there is a way to allocate "special" user-space like buffer for kernel and use it with O_DIRECT? Thanks, Dmitry -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>