Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] slab: move up code to get kmem_cache_node in free_block()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

> node isn't changed, so we don't need to retreive this structure
> everytime we move the object. Maybe compiler do this optimization,
> but making it explicitly is better.
> 

Qualifying the pointer as const would be even more explicit.

> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]