On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 01:51:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:25:07 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > >v2: > > > > - Although this patchset looks very different with v1, the end result, > > > > that is, mm/cma.c is same with v1's one. So I carry Ack to patch 6-7. > > > > > > > >This patchset is based on linux-next 20140610. > > > > > > Thanks for taking care of this. I will test it with my setup and if > > > everything goes well, I will take it to my -next tree. If any branch > > > is required for anyone to continue his works on top of those patches, > > > let me know, I will also prepare it. > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm glad to hear that. :) > > But, there is one concern. As you already know, I am preparing further > > patches (Aggressively allocate the pages on CMA reserved memory). It > > may be highly related to MM branch and also slightly depends on this CMA > > changes. In this case, what is the best strategy to merge this > > patchset? IMHO, Anrew's tree is more appropriate branch. If there is > > no issue in this case, I am willing to develope further patches based > > on your tree. > > That's probably easier. Marek, I'll merge these into -mm (and hence > -next and git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git) > and shall hold them pending you review/ack/test/etc, OK? Hello, Marek. Could you share your decision about this patchset? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>