On 06/23/2014 01:06 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Can the new vm_operation "name" be use for this? The magic "always > written to core dumps" feature might need to be reconsidered. One thing I'd like to avoid is an MPX vma getting merged with a non-MPX vma. I don't see any code to prevent two VMAs with different vm_ops->names from getting merged. That seems like a bit of a design oversight for ->name. Right? Thinking out loud a bit... There are also some more complicated but more performant cleanup mechanisms that I'd like to go after in the future. Given a page, we might want to figure out if it is an MPX page or not. I wonder if we'll ever collide with some other user of vm_ops->name. It looks fairly narrowly used at the moment, but would this keep us from putting these pages on, say, a tmpfs mount? Doesn't look that way at the moment. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>