On Thu, 19 Jun 2014, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:02:29PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > This change shaves a few bytes off the generated code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > mm/percpu.c | 3 +-- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c > > index 2ddf9a9..978097f 100644 > > --- a/mm/percpu.c > > +++ b/mm/percpu.c > > @@ -720,8 +720,7 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved) > > if (unlikely(align < 2)) > > align = 2; > > > > - if (unlikely(size & 1)) > > - size++; > > + size += size & 1; > > I'm not gonna apply this. This isn't that hot a path. It's not > worthwhile to micro optimize code like this. Dont we have an ALIGN() macro for this? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>