On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 02:18:53PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi Joonsoo, > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:21:38PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > We don't need explicit 'CMA:' prefix, since we already define prefix > > 'cma:' in pr_fmt. So remove it. > > > > And, some logs print function name and others doesn't. This looks > > bad to me, so I unify log format to print function name consistently. > > > > Lastly, I add one more debug log on cma_activate_area(). > > When I take a look, it just indicates cma_activate_area was called or not, > without what range for the area was reserved successfully so I couldn't see > the intention for new message. Description should explain it so that everybody > can agree on your claim. > Hello, I paste the answer in other thread. This pr_debug() comes from ppc kvm's kvm_cma_init_reserved_areas(). I want to maintain all log messages as much as possible to reduce confusion with this generalization. If I need to respin this patchset, I will explain more about it. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>