On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > I think that We can also replace for_each_node_state() in > free_kmem_cache_nodes(). What prevent it from being replaced? There is the problem that we are assigning NULL to s->node[node] which would not be covered so I thought I defer that for later when we deal with corner cases. > > > > Here is a patch doing the additional modifications: > > > > Seems good to me. Ok, who is queuing the patches? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>