Re: [patch] mm, memcg: periodically schedule when emptying page list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2 Jun 2014, David Rientjes wrote:

> mem_cgroup_force_empty_list() can iterate a large number of pages on an lru and 
> mem_cgroup_move_parent() doesn't return an errno unless certain criteria, none 
> of which indicate that the iteration may be taking too long, is met.
> 
> We have encountered the following stack trace many times indicating
> "need_resched set for > 51000020 ns (51 ticks) without schedule", for example:
> 
> 	scheduler_tick()
> 	<timer irq>
> 	mem_cgroup_move_account+0x4d/0x1d5
> 	mem_cgroup_move_parent+0x8d/0x109
> 	mem_cgroup_reparent_charges+0x149/0x2ba
> 	mem_cgroup_css_offline+0xeb/0x11b
> 	cgroup_offline_fn+0x68/0x16b
> 	process_one_work+0x129/0x350
> 
> If this iteration is taking too long, indicated by need_resched(), then 
> periodically schedule and continue from where we last left off.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/memcontrol.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -4764,6 +4764,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  	do {
>  		struct page_cgroup *pc;
>  		struct page *page;
> +		int ret;
>  
>  		spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lru_lock, flags);
>  		if (list_empty(list)) {
> @@ -4781,8 +4782,13 @@ static void mem_cgroup_force_empty_list(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  
>  		pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
>  
> -		if (mem_cgroup_move_parent(page, pc, memcg)) {
> -			/* found lock contention or "pc" is obsolete. */
> +		ret = mem_cgroup_move_parent(page, pc, memcg);
> +		if (ret || need_resched()) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Couldn't grab the page reference, isolate the page,
> +			 * there was a pc mismatch, or we simply need to
> +			 * schedule because this is taking too long.
> +			 */
>  			busy = page;
>  			cond_resched();
>  		} else

Why not just move that cond_resched() down below the if/else?
No need to test need_resched() separately, and this page is not busy.

Hugh

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]