On Fri, 30 May 2014 14:24:52 -0400 Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 05:25:39PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: > > > This patchset is the summary of recent discussion about memory error handling > > > on multithread application. Patch 1 and 2 is for action required errors, and > > > patch 3 is for action optional errors. > > > > Naoya, > > > > You suggested early in the discussion (when there were just two patches) that > > they deserved a "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx". I agreed, and still think the same > > way. > > Correct. AR error handling was added in v3.2-rc5, so adding > "Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # v3.2+" is fine. I'm not sure that "[PATCH 3/3] mm/memory-failure.c: support dedicated thread to handle SIGBUS(BUS_MCEERR_AO)" is a -stable thing? That's a feature addition more than a bugfix? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>