Vlastimil,
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Really sorry, guys :/
>
> -----8<-----
> From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 10:18:56 +0200
> Subject: mm-compaction-properly-signal-and-act-upon-lock-and-need_sched-contention-fix2
>
> Step 1: Change function name and comment between v1 and v2 so that the return
> value signals the opposite thing.
> Step 2: Change the call sites to reflect the opposite return value.
> Step 3: ???
> Step 4: Make a complete fool of yourself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index a525cd4..5175019 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -237,13 +237,13 @@ static inline bool compact_should_abort(struct compact_control *cc)
> if (need_resched()) {
> if (cc->mode == MIGRATE_ASYNC) {
> cc->contended = true;
> - return false;
> + return true;
> }
>
> cond_resched();
> }
>
> - return true;
> + return false;
> }
This patch is still not in linux-next.
Could you please submit it formally?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>