On Sat, 31 May 2014, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 05/31/2014 10:33 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > On Thu, 29 May 2014, Dave Jones wrote: > > > >> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:47 > >> in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 5787, name: trinity-c27 > >> Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff990acc7e>] vtime_account_system+0x1e/0x50 > > Just wondering, since I'm not familiar with this kind of bug, is the line above > bogus or what does it mean? I don't see how the stack trace or the fix patch is > related to vtime_account_system? I know no more about it than you do, never noticed such a message before, and clearly not helpful here. I expect it's like those "last sysfs file" messages, occasionally useful but mostly noise. Hugh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>