On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:32:47AM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 04:11:10AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Wed, 21 May 2014 22:04:22 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Currently we split all THP pages on any clear_refs request. It's not > > > > necessary. We can handle this on PMD level. > > > > > > > > One side effect is that soft dirty will potentially see more dirty > > > > memory, since we will mark whole THP page dirty at once. > > > > > > This clashes pretty badly with > > > http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/clear_refs-redefine-callback-functions-for-page-table-walker.patch > > > > Hm.. For some reason CRIU memory-snapshotting test cases fail on current > > linux-next. I didn't debug why. Mainline works. Folks? > > Thanks for noticing, Kirill! I don't test linux-test regulary will try and > report the results. OK, I managed to run criu on linux-next. Due to changes in vdso it no longer able to run. I'll handle it in criu and ping you then. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>