Re: Node 0 not necessary for powerpc?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 19 May 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:

> I'm seeing a panic at boot with this change on an LPAR which actually
> has no Node 0. Here's what I think is happening:
>
> start_kernel
>     ...
>     -> setup_per_cpu_areas
>         -> pcpu_embed_first_chunk
>             -> pcpu_fc_alloc
>                 -> ___alloc_bootmem_node(NODE_DATA(cpu_to_node(cpu), ...
>     -> smp_prepare_boot_cpu
>         -> set_numa_node(boot_cpuid)
>
> So we panic on the NODE_DATA call. It seems that ia64, at least, uses
> pcpu_alloc_first_chunk rather than embed. x86 has some code to handle
> early calls of cpu_to_node (early_cpu_to_node) and sets the mapping for
> all CPUs in setup_per_cpu_areas().

Maybe we can switch ia64 too embed? Tejun: Why are there these
dependencies?

> Thoughts? Does that mean we need something similar to x86 for powerpc?

Tejun is the expert in this area. CCing him.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]