Currently, on kmem_cache_destroy we delete the cache from the slab_list before __kmem_cache_shutdown, inserting it back to the list on failure. Initially, this was done, because we could release the slab_mutex in __kmem_cache_shutdown to delete sysfs slub entry, but since commit 41a212859a4d ("slub: use sysfs'es release mechanism for kmem_cache") we remove sysfs entry later in kmem_cache_destroy after dropping the slab_mutex, so that no implementation of __kmem_cache_shutdown can ever release the lock. Therefore we can simplify the code a bit by moving list_del after __kmem_cache_shutdown. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx> --- mm/slab_common.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c index 48fafb61f35e..735e01a0db6f 100644 --- a/mm/slab_common.c +++ b/mm/slab_common.c @@ -346,15 +346,15 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s) if (memcg_cleanup_cache_params(s) != 0) goto out_unlock; - list_del(&s->list); if (__kmem_cache_shutdown(s) != 0) { - list_add(&s->list, &slab_caches); printk(KERN_ERR "kmem_cache_destroy %s: " "Slab cache still has objects\n", s->name); dump_stack(); goto out_unlock; } + list_del(&s->list); + mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex); if (s->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU) rcu_barrier(); -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>